<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You See Berkeley Representin&#8217;</title>
	<link>http://calstuff.blogsome.com/2006/12/22/you-see-berkeley-representin/</link>
	<description>News and Observations about the University of California, Berkeley.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 08:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Bhanu Singh</title>
		<link>http://calstuff.blogsome.com/2006/12/22/you-see-berkeley-representin/#comment-9065</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 17:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://calstuff.blogsome.com/2006/12/22/you-see-berkeley-representin/#comment-9065</guid>
					<description>No, Shawn - exactly.

The Berkeley brand is already built into a global name for better or for worse - might as well exploit it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>No, Shawn - exactly.</p>
	<p>The Berkeley brand is already built into a global name for better or for worse - might as well exploit it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: No, Shawn</title>
		<link>http://calstuff.blogsome.com/2006/12/22/you-see-berkeley-representin/#comment-9062</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 08:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://calstuff.blogsome.com/2006/12/22/you-see-berkeley-representin/#comment-9062</guid>
					<description>Shawn, you don't get it. Terms are defined by the people who use them. By convention, UC refers to the entire system, not just Berkeley. It is not within your power to change this convention. Instead, it is in our interests to link the two names, Cal and Berkeley, to avoid confusion. That Cal is already used to refer to Berkeley is sufficient proof of a historical tradition, no? Why be ashamed of &quot;Berkeley&quot;? The name is already prestigious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Shawn, you don&#8217;t get it. Terms are defined by the people who use them. By convention, UC refers to the entire system, not just Berkeley. It is not within your power to change this convention. Instead, it is in our interests to link the two names, Cal and Berkeley, to avoid confusion. That Cal is already used to refer to Berkeley is sufficient proof of a historical tradition, no? Why be ashamed of &#8220;Berkeley&#8221;? The name is already prestigious.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Shawn</title>
		<link>http://calstuff.blogsome.com/2006/12/22/you-see-berkeley-representin/#comment-9049</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2006 15:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://calstuff.blogsome.com/2006/12/22/you-see-berkeley-representin/#comment-9049</guid>
					<description>you dont get my point.  We are the University of California.  Just like UNC is the University of North Carolina, even though they have other satelite campuses in greensboro etc.   They dont say UNC-Chapel Hill.  When i said we don't need the UC, I'm saying we shouldnt be UCB.  Either CAL or the University of California.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>you dont get my point.  We are the University of California.  Just like UNC is the University of North Carolina, even though they have other satelite campuses in greensboro etc.   They dont say UNC-Chapel Hill.  When i said we don&#8217;t need the UC, I&#8217;m saying we shouldnt be UCB.  Either CAL or the University of California.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Bhanu Singh</title>
		<link>http://calstuff.blogsome.com/2006/12/22/you-see-berkeley-representin/#comment-9048</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2006 14:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://calstuff.blogsome.com/2006/12/22/you-see-berkeley-representin/#comment-9048</guid>
					<description>I agree we don't need the UC prefix.  Around the world our most dominant brand is simply &quot;Berkeley&quot;, or &quot;Buh-kuh-lee&quot; in Asia.  Outside of regional California, no one knows what the hell &quot;Cal&quot; is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I agree we don&#8217;t need the UC prefix.  Around the world our most dominant brand is simply &#8220;Berkeley&#8221;, or &#8220;Buh-kuh-lee&#8221; in Asia.  Outside of regional California, no one knows what the hell &#8220;Cal&#8221; is.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Shawn</title>
		<link>http://calstuff.blogsome.com/2006/12/22/you-see-berkeley-representin/#comment-9047</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2006 00:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://calstuff.blogsome.com/2006/12/22/you-see-berkeley-representin/#comment-9047</guid>
					<description>That is ridiculous.  We are the university of CALifornia.  We are CAL.  UCBerkeley is what you brag about when you first get your acceptance, or after you arrive on campus etc.  But when you graduate, you realize you are a CAL Alum!  UCDavis, UCR, UCLA, UCI, etc.  We don't need the UC pefix.  We gave birth to the whole damn system. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>That is ridiculous.  We are the university of CALifornia.  We are CAL.  UCBerkeley is what you brag about when you first get your acceptance, or after you arrive on campus etc.  But when you graduate, you realize you are a CAL Alum!  UCDavis, UCR, UCLA, UCI, etc.  We don&#8217;t need the UC pefix.  We gave birth to the whole damn system.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Bhanu Singh</title>
		<link>http://calstuff.blogsome.com/2006/12/22/you-see-berkeley-representin/#comment-9044</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2006 12:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://calstuff.blogsome.com/2006/12/22/you-see-berkeley-representin/#comment-9044</guid>
					<description>Good commercial.

Best way to address divide between academics and athletics is to raise admissions standards and graduation rates.

As far as the Cal/Berkeley split, the university should do more to include the &quot;Berkeley&quot; brand on signage and on fields/courts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Good commercial.</p>
	<p>Best way to address divide between academics and athletics is to raise admissions standards and graduation rates.</p>
	<p>As far as the Cal/Berkeley split, the university should do more to include the &#8220;Berkeley&#8221; brand on signage and on fields/courts.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: hey dude</title>
		<link>http://calstuff.blogsome.com/2006/12/22/you-see-berkeley-representin/#comment-9041</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2006 14:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://calstuff.blogsome.com/2006/12/22/you-see-berkeley-representin/#comment-9041</guid>
					<description>the domicile commercial was great, but, it is great to hear that the university recognizes its identity crisis between sports and academics and is trying to change it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>the domicile commercial was great, but, it is great to hear that the university recognizes its identity crisis between sports and academics and is trying to change it
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Chris Smyr</title>
		<link>http://calstuff.blogsome.com/2006/12/22/you-see-berkeley-representin/#comment-9039</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Dec 2006 01:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://calstuff.blogsome.com/2006/12/22/you-see-berkeley-representin/#comment-9039</guid>
					<description>Off-topic but worth it:

There's a new decal being offered in the Spring, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.decal.org/199&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;The Weblog as a Medium for Nonfiction Creative Writing&quot;&lt;/a&gt;.  Seems like a great way for beginners to get started (I'm talking to all of you collectively, anonybots), and for everyone as motivation to be prolific.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Off-topic but worth it:</p>
	<p>There&#8217;s a new decal being offered in the Spring, <a href="http://www.decal.org/199" rel="nofollow">&#8220;The Weblog as a Medium for Nonfiction Creative Writing&#8221;</a>.  Seems like a great way for beginners to get started (I&#8217;m talking to all of you collectively, anonybots), and for everyone as motivation to be prolific.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Glicky</title>
		<link>http://calstuff.blogsome.com/2006/12/22/you-see-berkeley-representin/#comment-9038</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2006 23:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://calstuff.blogsome.com/2006/12/22/you-see-berkeley-representin/#comment-9038</guid>
					<description>Whose Domicile? will always be legendary, but this is a fine, classy commercial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Whose Domicile? will always be legendary, but this is a fine, classy commercial.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: steph</title>
		<link>http://calstuff.blogsome.com/2006/12/22/you-see-berkeley-representin/#comment-9037</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2006 12:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://calstuff.blogsome.com/2006/12/22/you-see-berkeley-representin/#comment-9037</guid>
					<description>i LOVE  the whose domicile commercial. that was a perfect mix of athletics and academics, and damn funny too. this one isn't bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>i LOVE  the whose domicile commercial. that was a perfect mix of athletics and academics, and damn funny too. this one isn&#8217;t bad.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
