Comments on: Another ASUC Update http://calstuff.blogsome.com/2006/07/09/another-asuc-update/ News and Observations about the University of California, Berkeley. Tue, 29 Dec 2009 08:15:21 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha by: anyone http://calstuff.blogsome.com/2006/07/09/another-asuc-update/#comment-7689 Mon, 10 Jul 2006 21:19:18 +0100 http://calstuff.blogsome.com/2006/07/09/another-asuc-update/#comment-7689 The remaining part of the EO is a violation--the way the judicial council limits Oren in his role, but that judgment hasnt even been appealed yet--so internal remedies haven't been exhausted. Separately, in the Ratto case, there may be standing after Jul 15. Hopefully Judicial Council will stand down. The remaining part of the EO is a violation–the way the judicial council limits Oren in his role, but that judgment hasnt even been appealed yet–so internal remedies haven’t been exhausted.

Separately, in the Ratto case, there may be standing after Jul 15. Hopefully Judicial Council will stand down.

]]> by: sideliner http://calstuff.blogsome.com/2006/07/09/another-asuc-update/#comment-7674 Mon, 10 Jul 2006 15:41:32 +0100 http://calstuff.blogsome.com/2006/07/09/another-asuc-update/#comment-7674 As I read the briefs, it appears that the judge accepted Mark Himelstein's argument that by approving that part of EO 8 that made Oren acting president, the Judicial Council had already given him what he was asking for in the TRO, so there was no need to approve it. As I read the briefs, it appears that the judge accepted Mark Himelstein’s argument that by approving that part of EO 8 that made Oren acting president, the Judicial Council had already given him what he was asking for in the TRO, so there was no need to approve it.

]]> by: chet (CEO) http://calstuff.blogsome.com/2006/07/09/another-asuc-update/#comment-7673 Mon, 10 Jul 2006 15:19:31 +0100 http://calstuff.blogsome.com/2006/07/09/another-asuc-update/#comment-7673 thanks for the update, Karl, that is awesome. F*ck SA and f*ck Oren Gabriel !!! thanks for the update, Karl, that is awesome. F*ck SA and f*ck Oren Gabriel !!!

]]> by: Beetle http://calstuff.blogsome.com/2006/07/09/another-asuc-update/#comment-7672 Mon, 10 Jul 2006 14:59:15 +0100 http://calstuff.blogsome.com/2006/07/09/another-asuc-update/#comment-7672 But, but, "anyone" said that they'd totally get it! But, but, “anyone” said that they’d totally get it!

]]> by: Karl http://calstuff.blogsome.com/2006/07/09/another-asuc-update/#comment-7671 Mon, 10 Jul 2006 14:47:12 +0100 http://calstuff.blogsome.com/2006/07/09/another-asuc-update/#comment-7671 Application for a TRO DENIED Application for a TRO DENIED

]]> by: RepBast1984 http://calstuff.blogsome.com/2006/07/09/another-asuc-update/#comment-7670 Mon, 10 Jul 2006 14:12:45 +0100 http://calstuff.blogsome.com/2006/07/09/another-asuc-update/#comment-7670 Well they do derive all their power from the UC regents, which yanks $55 dolalrs from us and gives it to the ASUC Well they do derive all their power from the UC regents, which yanks $55 dolalrs from us and gives it to the ASUC

]]> by: sideliner http://calstuff.blogsome.com/2006/07/09/another-asuc-update/#comment-7669 Mon, 10 Jul 2006 14:09:49 +0100 http://calstuff.blogsome.com/2006/07/09/another-asuc-update/#comment-7669 On the Parties section of the Alameda County Courts site devoted to Gabriel v. ASUC, it is identified as "Associated Students of the University of California, an unincorporated association". Clearly the UC is a governmental entity, and the ASUC as a semi-autonomous entity within UC will probably be considered a government entity as well. On the Parties section of the Alameda County Courts site devoted to Gabriel v. ASUC, it is identified as “Associated Students of the University of California, an unincorporated association”.

Clearly the UC is a governmental entity, and the ASUC as a semi-autonomous entity within UC will probably be considered a government entity as well.

]]> by: RepBast1984 http://calstuff.blogsome.com/2006/07/09/another-asuc-update/#comment-7668 Mon, 10 Jul 2006 14:05:01 +0100 http://calstuff.blogsome.com/2006/07/09/another-asuc-update/#comment-7668 Ok sorry i cede it, you're right if that website is right. i'm more versed in federal law. But we call compelling a private actor to do soemthing or not to do soemthign injunctive relief. Ok sorry i cede it, you’re right if that website is right. i’m more versed in federal law. But we call compelling a private actor to do soemthing or not to do soemthign injunctive relief.

]]> by: RepBast1984 http://calstuff.blogsome.com/2006/07/09/another-asuc-update/#comment-7667 Mon, 10 Jul 2006 14:03:06 +0100 http://calstuff.blogsome.com/2006/07/09/another-asuc-update/#comment-7667 "to order government agencies or other organizations to do one thing or another" Are you saying the ASUC is a government agency or other organization? A writ of mandamus can't be issued against a private club. “to order government agencies or other organizations to do one thing or another”

Are you saying the ASUC is a government agency or other organization? A writ of mandamus can’t be issued against a private club.

]]> by: sideliner http://calstuff.blogsome.com/2006/07/09/another-asuc-update/#comment-7666 Mon, 10 Jul 2006 13:39:25 +0100 http://calstuff.blogsome.com/2006/07/09/another-asuc-update/#comment-7666 You're wrong RepBast. A Writ of Mandamus can be issued by Superior Courts (and are frequently) to order government agencies or other organizations to do one thing or another. There are also Appellate Writs of Mandamus (to which you refer), but they are not what is being applied for here. Check the definition at this link: http://www.lectlaw.com/def2/m079.htm You’re wrong RepBast. A Writ of Mandamus can be issued by Superior Courts (and are frequently) to order government agencies or other organizations to do one thing or another. There are also Appellate Writs of Mandamus (to which you refer), but they are not what is being applied for here.

Check the definition at this link:

http://www.lectlaw.com/def2/m079.htm

]]>