CalStuff: News. Observations

Cal vs. USC (Final 35-10 USC)

Posted by Andy R. in Football
November 12, 2005 at 1:19 pm

21-3 USC
14-3 USC
7-3 USC, at the moment.

*You can’t spell sucks without U… S… Ayoob

[Chime in with comments throughout the game for everyone who is watching from home.]

« Help Find A Student’s Missing Mother Stanfurd now caring about rivalary, decide to play pranks »

91 Little Bears Said...

  1. so this is what tedford gets 1.5M for?

    Comment by mano — November 12, 2005 @ 1:59 pm

  2. Ayoob is dyslexic! That would explain the first interception, where he clearly thought the receiver was running a different pattern.

    I feel a bit bad for the guy, but seriously, I’d rather have Longshore in there with a broken leg right now.

    Comment by brendan — November 12, 2005 @ 2:20 pm

  3. whatever, even the defense is falling apart now.

    Comment by mano — November 12, 2005 @ 2:44 pm

  4. there’s my redheaded cousin.

    What a drubbing. Do they have a mercy rule in college football, like in high school softball and volleyball - when does it kick in?

    Comment by cp — November 12, 2005 @ 3:41 pm

  5. do we think it would have been any different if whatshisname didnt break himself at the beginning of the season? tedford has never had full confidence in ayoob and it shows. he’s a constant nervous wreck.

    Comment by Anonymous — November 12, 2005 @ 5:04 pm

  6. Once again, Ayoob throws more INTs than TDs. The game didn’t rest on his shoulders, but he sure didn’t try to make it even close.

    Let the petition to bench Ayoob begin!

    Comment by Anti Ayoob — November 12, 2005 @ 5:30 pm

  7. By the way, I forgot to mention, but I am starting to realize that Tedford doesn’t want to admit a mistake in keeping Ayoob.

    *NOTE*: JT, YOU ARE DRAGGING THE TEAM INTO HELL FOR NOT ADMITTING YOUR MISJUDGEMENT. BENCH A QB WHO SIMPLY CANNOT PASS THE BALL ANYMORE.

    We didn’t pay 1.5 mill to not give the team a fighting chance to win.

    Comment by Anti Ayoob — November 12, 2005 @ 5:50 pm

  8. Tedford’s approach to this game was awful. His play calling wasn’t aggresive in the slightest bit. You need to shoot for the end zone to beat USC.

    Comment by Fan — November 12, 2005 @ 5:50 pm

  9. I say bench Tedford.

    Comment by Fan — November 12, 2005 @ 5:50 pm

  10. Ayoob is a bust. There’s nothing that we can do about that now. and obviously, if there was anyone else on the team who could play QB, Ayoob would have been benched.

    Tedford is not “clinging” to some mistake of his. If that was the case, Longshore wouldnt have been the starter at the beginning of the season, after Ayoob was recruited with much hype.

    and Tedford can’t be aggressive in play calling with a QB who makes easy routine passes look like a struggle.

    Cal still looks to be a perennial contender which is more than one could say a few years ago.. so calm down, freshmen.

    Comment by tom — November 12, 2005 @ 6:09 pm

  11. tom’s right. If Tedford had a better option at quarterback, he would have made a change already. Longshore is hurt, there’s no sense in burning Kyle Reed’s redshirt now (and as a true freshman, i doubt he has much understanding of the offense, Tedford would have to dumb it down more than he has already if Reed were playing), and honestly, Levy is not going to solve any problems.

    Comment by captain anonymous — November 12, 2005 @ 6:16 pm

  12. If we lose with Levy or with Ayoob, what’s the difference? Atleast Levy doesn’t have a stupid name or look retarded on TV.

    Comment by Anonymous — November 12, 2005 @ 6:50 pm

  13. Anyone see Longshore in full uniform today walkin around fine? Maybe putt him in against stanfurd? Or maybe too risky?

    Comment by Bfeinberg — November 12, 2005 @ 8:36 pm

  14. I’d say putting Longshore in against Stanfurd is still too risky. He’s probably okay to gear up and walk around, but at this point an average-strength hit would probably do more damage than it would under normal circumstances.

    We saw Levy play today against USC’s backup defense, and he wasn’t bad. People may tar and feather me for this, but I say start Ayoob next week at the Big Game - he’s obviously no Aaron Rodgers, but he’s still played his heart out for this team. I’d feel differently if he’d been putzing around slacking off at practice, but everything I’ve heard from others on the football team indicate otherwise. Even if he IS well on his way to being the lowest-ranked QB in the Pac-10, he still deserves to take the first snap at the Big Game. I’ve said my fair share of harsh things about Ayoob, but I’ve never doubted that he’s TRYING - it just happens that the best he’s got right now isn’t cutting it. I’m not taking the whole “well none of you guys could do any better so shut up” argument, because I don’t believe in it - I definitely think that the expectation for Joe Ayoob should be higher than the expectation for say, me, since I’ve never played a game of football outside of middle school PE in my life and he’s been trained to play football. But I do think that just because he’s not doing well doesn’t mean he doesn’t care about the team, or that he hasn’t put in his share of the effort. So let him start the Big Game - he got thrust into this role unexpectedly and didn’t adjust well, but he’s tried to pull himself up and has stepped up at times, though not as often as many of us might have liked. My only caveat is that Tedford be willing to pull him out more quickly than was done today if Ayoob still shows that he’s not up to it.

    Let the bashing of my stance begin.

    Comment by One more game — November 12, 2005 @ 8:54 pm

  15. Ooh, the Tom Holmoe defense. “Sure, he sucks, but he’s such a nice/dedicated guy.”

    Comment by Beetle — November 12, 2005 @ 9:15 pm

  16. There’s no way any coach would put in someone who broke his leg at the beginning of the season. Longshore may be moving and throwing, but he’s in no shape to be playing a football game. Since he didn’t even play one game this year, my guess is that he will get this year back as a redshirt. Does anyone know?

    One more game - I’m not going to bash your stance. Ayoob’s started all the other games this year (minus Sac State of course). I expect Tedford to go with him.

    The following doesn’t change anything, but I find it frustrating. Maybe I’m just tired of cocky attitudes by Pete Carroll, Matt Leinart, et al. I’m not denying the fact that they are damn good, so don’t get me wrong.

    From espn.com: “That’s the best defense we’ve played all year, but by far the cheapest,” Cal guard Aaron Merz said. “I got spit on. I make a good block, and the guy spits on me. I saw that too many times today. It’s disgusting. I got poked in the eye. They had their hands in our facemasks all day.”

    Comment by A — November 12, 2005 @ 9:25 pm

  17. A: you have to miss 90% of your regular season games to qualify for a redshirt year, and Longshore does qualify.

    Ayoob is going to start against Stanford, probably. To change QBs right now would be probably panicking.

    Comment by ? — November 12, 2005 @ 10:16 pm

  18. It’s a matter of confidence at this point to bench Ayoob or not. Right now he doesn’t have it, and you can’t start a QB who’s hesitant to pass with authority.

    Tedford may still feel that Ayoob is better than Levy, not honestly you can’t start anyone who cracked in the tunnel after the game. To me, that’ just as risky at this point.

    Comment by Anti Ayoob — November 13, 2005 @ 12:34 am

  19. saw a guy wearing a “ayoob for heisman” shirt today getting escorted off the field by two cops. either he is incredibly moronic or incredibly ironic. most likely a bit of both.

    Comment by ari — November 13, 2005 @ 12:55 am

  20. Anti Ayoob: I don’t know if you remember Alexis Serna, the field goal kicker for OSU. After the LSU game last year (a 2 pt victory for LSU where OSU had missed 3 field goals), Alexis Serna was on the floor in the lockerroom, crying in the fetal position. All of this was shown on national TV because someone had the bright idea to put a camera in there.

    Anyhow, the point being, Serna buckled up and became a phenomenal field goal kicker for the rest of the season, including earning a scholarship (He was a walk-on).

    As such, I don’t think crying in the tunnel is necessarily precluding Ayoob from playing in the Big Game. Football is an emotional sport, and setting the level of expectation for our football players to be stoic statues is just not rational.

    Ayoob will most likely start because Tedford has started with him all season: if Levy had been able to win out during practices, then he’d go in. Unfortunately, the marginal advantage gained by putting in a fresh Levy right now is rendered moot by the experience Ayoob has at this point.

    Comment by ? — November 13, 2005 @ 3:24 am

  21. youth is wasted on the young

    Comment by quotidian — November 13, 2005 @ 7:47 am

  22. Who the fuck cares? Just beat Stanford.

    Comment by H+M — November 13, 2005 @ 10:04 am

  23. “Ayoob is a bust. There’s nothing that we can do about that now. and obviously, if there was anyone else on the team who could play QB, Ayoob would have been benched.”

    It took Tedford 3.5 humiliating losses to realize that he needed to use someone else. We paid him 1.5 million dollars to defend a douchebag that laughs when he screws up. If we don’t put Levy in, we’re goign to lose the axe. This leaves Longshore and Reed 2 awesome redshirt players for next year. We’re going to suffer from recruitment because of Ayoob the Boob but we really have a lot of hope afterwards.

    If we end 7-4 that’s as good as Aaron Rodgers’ first year. If we lose the Big Game not only are we going to devolve into teh kyle Boller days, but we won’t even have the axe.

    And to the person who said Ayoob was a dedicated guy who loves the team, he can be just as dedicated and root for the team on the bench or in the student section. Just don’t put him anywhere where he’s going to cause harm.

    Comment by Anonymity — November 13, 2005 @ 10:18 am

  24. Joe Ayoob needs to go back to middle school and play flag football with Tom Holmoe.

    Ironically, Tom Holmoe is now Athletic Director of BYU, and they’re #2 in the Mountain West.

    Comment by RepBast1984 — November 13, 2005 @ 10:35 am

  25. fyi: serna missed 3 extra points in the LSU game

    Comment by anon — November 13, 2005 @ 11:01 am

  26. Anonymity,

    Let’s not knock the ‘Kyle Boller days.’ Boller’s the guy who made us good again with Tedford’s help. Boller’s the guy who took us from 1-10 to 7-4. Boller’s the guy who first got us the ax back 3 years ago.

    Don’t knock Boller, who went out on the highest note we could have possibly expected.

    Comment by Morbo — November 13, 2005 @ 12:28 pm

  27. Ayoob is an embarrassment on the field and in the classroom.

    Get some real scholar athletes, for Christ’s sake. At least we can save face academically.

    Comment by Bhanu Singh — November 13, 2005 @ 12:59 pm

  28. In more important news, I hope someone here will increase publicity of the misappropriate use of funds by top UC execs, that the Chronicle is reporting. A nice, salient tidbit is that last year almost a billion dollars was spent on perks, bonuses, etc… more than enough to compensate for the 79% tuition hikes that we’ve seen. Fuck USC, focus on real news.

    Comment by iliketapioca — November 13, 2005 @ 1:32 pm

  29. have you ever been in a class with Ayoob? do you know what his GPA is? do you know how he did on his midterms this semester? or are you just talking out of your ass?

    well, i can do that too. bhanu singh is an embarassment in the classroom.

    Comment by captain anonymous — November 13, 2005 @ 1:41 pm

  30. all righty then, captain anonymous. perhaps i should send you my transcript–i’m sure you’d be quite impressed.

    ayoob wasn’t exactly an academic superstar coming in. i have no idea how he’s doing now. hopefully better than he is on the field.

    Comment by Bhanu Singh — November 13, 2005 @ 1:44 pm

  31. >>It took Tedford 3.5 humiliating losses to realize that he needed to use someone else. We paid him 1.5 million dollars to defend a douchebag that laughs when he screws up.

    Anonymity- It didnt take Tedford 3.5 losses to “realize” this. what makes you think that Tedford is even planning to use “someone else” yet?

    My guess is that it took Tedford about 30 secs after Longshore went down to realize that we weren’t going to contend for the national title this year. Recall Ayoob’s 0-10 performance in the first game he played. Tedford already showed zero confidence in Ayoob by not giving him the starting job to begin with.

    I’m sure that Tedford is desperately seeking other options, which includes re-evaluating Levy and Longshore each week. so my point remains.

    If there was anyone else on the team who could play QB, Ayoob would have been benched. Against Stanford, it will probably be enough to have Ayoob hand the ball off to Lynch and Forsett on every down. If Tedford feels that Levy is ready, then it may be another story.

    Comment by tom — November 13, 2005 @ 3:12 pm

  32. so then you’re admitting that your claim “Ayoob is an embarassment in the classroom” was completely baseless and unfounded speculation?

    well, guess what, your claim that “he wasn’t exactly an academic superstar coming in” is equally baseless. Have you seen his transcripts from high school and CCSF? Do you know what his SAT score was? Do you know how many AP courses he took?

    bhanu singh is still an embarassment in the classroom

    Comment by captain anonymous — November 13, 2005 @ 4:13 pm

  33. Joe Ayoob was his highschool class valedictorian, a presidential scholar, and took 1,463 AP Courses, receiving a 5 on every exam (if the graders could have awarded 6’s they would have!)

    Comment by bob — November 13, 2005 @ 4:34 pm

  34. Really, bob?

    I feel better now.

    Comment by Bhanu Singh — November 13, 2005 @ 4:37 pm

  35. The turnaround in the Cal football program since Tedford was hired clearly indicates his worth as a Division I coach, as does the fact that Cal has remained competitive despite a rash of injuries on both sides of the ball. Unfortunately, Joe Ayoob has not delivered on the potential suggested by his outstanding JC record; he is clearly not the one to lead Cal to the national championship. Coach Tedford, however, is the best thing to happen to Cal football during my lifetime, and he and the team deserve our continued support.

    Comment by BR, Class of 1969 — November 13, 2005 @ 4:48 pm

  36. whatever, how can you explain that second fieldgoal attempt. 1.5 million for that?

    Comment by mano — November 13, 2005 @ 5:14 pm

  37. Schneider missed a 41 yard attempt. Not exactly a walk in the park, though it’s still short of his longest successful kick. And the guy IS still our team’s leading scorer, putting up more points than Marshawn Lynch and Justin Forsett combined (though that probably speaks more to the overall ineffectiveness of our offense than anything else).

    Comment by Blank — November 13, 2005 @ 6:51 pm

  38. My point is that Tedford should have gone for it. Might have come up short, sure, but that was the exact moment when our spirit was broken - until then, we were still in the game. Tedford’s fault, not Schneider’s.

    Comment by mano — November 13, 2005 @ 7:30 pm

  39. Yeah, that is true. USC already had what, 28 points at the time? Something ridiculous.

    Comment by Blank — November 13, 2005 @ 7:34 pm

  40. At what point does Tedford NOT deserve our respect? If we have a losing season next year. We can’t let one awesome season automatically make up for contant failures this season.

    Comment by RepBast1984 — November 13, 2005 @ 8:30 pm

  41. either you respect him or you dont. i mean, are you proposing that people will themselves to stop respecting him? that sounds silly.

    Comment by mano — November 13, 2005 @ 8:40 pm

  42. Blank - check out the leading score on any NFL team. it’s always the kicker, dumbass.

    Comment by tom — November 13, 2005 @ 10:10 pm

  43. tom - I apologize for my apparent ignorance on the matter. And no, I’m not being sarcastic - thanks for pointing out my error so I don’t continue saying stupid things.

    Comment by Blank — November 13, 2005 @ 10:57 pm

  44. http://www.nfl.com/stats/leaders/NFL/TPTS/2005/regular

    hey tom, only 24 of the NFL’s top 30 scorers this season are kickers. it would appear that you are the “dumbass”.

    Comment by bob — November 14, 2005 @ 12:23 am

  45. To paraphrase Colbert,

    Joe Ayoob: Great or Greatest quarterback? make your decision

    Comment by jarod — November 14, 2005 @ 12:33 am

  46. Bob: Generally, in the Pac-10 the leading scorer is usually not the kicker. In the NFL and other offensively challenged conferences (like the SEC), will the kicker usually be the top scorer.

    Look at Pac-10 conference stats. We haven’t been as good as we were say, last year, when we usually punched it in the endzone.

    But, then again, JJ and Rodgers were phenoms.

    Comment by ? — November 14, 2005 @ 1:30 am

  47. Dear Bhanu Singh,

    You are an unqualified idiot.

    regards,

    Apu.

    p.s Joe told me he wants to bash your face in. Please meet him in the visiting player’s locker room at 10.30 pm after we crush stanfurd, beating the Vegas spread. Does anyone know what the spread is? Sagarin’s computer ratings have Cal as +5. And those ratings mean as much as Bhanu Singh’s dissertation. C.r.a.p.

    Comment by Apu the Oliphant — November 14, 2005 @ 8:55 am

  48. Dear Apu,

    I’m sorry you and your friend Joe have taken personal offense. My apologies.

    My plea here is for generally high academic standards for incoming athletes, where we could certainly do better. That’s all.

    Go Bears

    Comment by Bhanu Singh — November 14, 2005 @ 9:51 am

  49. Dissertation? Please! Bhanu is not a grad student.

    Comment by mano — November 14, 2005 @ 10:21 am

  50. mano, correct. i’ve finished my PhD.

    Comment by Bhanu Singh — November 14, 2005 @ 10:28 am

  51. Are you guys going to cover the Sherman Boyson ni**er incident? I can’t wait to comment!

    Comment by anon54 — November 14, 2005 @ 11:44 am

  52. really? whats your area and your institution?

    Comment by mano — November 14, 2005 @ 12:23 pm

  53. Yeah me too.

    Comment by Anonymity — November 14, 2005 @ 12:41 pm

  54. Sardarji,

    Kyon argue kar raha hei? Ayoob to Ayoob hei..classrom vich kee karanga?*

    *Something to the lines of: Football players are football players. They’re here to play Football.

    Whether they graduate or not is a fantastic, but unexpected bonus. All that crap about student-athletes-think for a second if a coach like Mack Brown ever takes that stuff seriously. Yup, that’s what separates teams like us from teams like Texas. We have student-athletes, they have athletes who might just be students if it happens to be convenient and what not.

    Bhanu, please stop knocking Joe. He’s down, and he’s hurt, and he’s probably broken inside. He needs your support now more than ever. He’d like nothing more than to play to his ability (we’ve all seen him do ok…iwe know he can), blow out ‘furd, and win the fans’ appreciation.

    Don’t be a jackass and say things about his classroom ability, especially when you are talking right out of your rather large Punjabi ass**.

    Regards,

    Apu

    ** I know Punjabi men have fat asses. I see one in the mirror every day.

    Comment by Apu the Oliphant — November 14, 2005 @ 12:45 pm

  55. “He’d like nothing more than to play to his ability (we’ve all seen him do ok…iwe know he can), blow out ‘furd, and win the fans’ appreciation.”

    But he won’t will he?

    Comment by Anonymity — November 14, 2005 @ 12:55 pm

  56. And you know what, President Bush would love for the economy to be good, for less illegals to cross the border (that one’s debateable), less spending (also debatable), the War in Iraq to go well. We should support the President no matter what and stop blood-curdling hate speech when his name is brought up. Correct?

    Comment by Anonymity — November 14, 2005 @ 12:56 pm

  57. >>Bhanu, please stop knocking Joe. He’s down, and he’s hurt, and he’s probably broken inside. He needs your support now more than ever.

    hah.. this ayoob guy sounds like a (pansy).

    Comment by bob — November 14, 2005 @ 12:57 pm

  58. anon #56:

    what a dumbass.

    Comment by bob — November 14, 2005 @ 12:58 pm

  59. “All that crap about student-athletes-think for a second if a coach like Mack Brown ever takes that stuff seriously. Yup, that’s what separates teams like us from teams like Texas.”

    Apu, it’s also what separates schools like us (and Michigan, and yes, even Stanford) from schools like Texas. I don’t (and will never) see it as a point of derision that we here at Berkeley actually want our *student*-athletes (notice which comes first) to be, oh I dunno, students.

    Comment by 2411 — November 14, 2005 @ 1:02 pm

  60. haha i like how you attack me without reason.

    Comment by Anonymity — November 14, 2005 @ 1:24 pm

  61. let’s talk about sherman boyson!

    Comment by anon54 — November 14, 2005 @ 1:50 pm

  62. Tedford doesn’t give a shit about how his players are doing academically. So long as the NCAA says their grades are good enough, Tedford is happy. Don’t use that “UC Berkeley is academically superior” as an excuse for our football team’s woes. Ever had a football player in a group in one of your intro classes? They don’t do SHIT.

    Comment by Fan — November 14, 2005 @ 2:55 pm

  63. I know…let’s talk about Boyson. Forget Ayoob.

    Comment by Anonymous — November 14, 2005 @ 4:56 pm

  64. Fan, that’s what worries me.

    2411, I agree completely.

    Comment by Bhanu Singh — November 14, 2005 @ 5:12 pm

  65. well bhanu? whats the degree in and from where?

    Comment by mano — November 14, 2005 @ 5:33 pm

  66. mano, i’d rather keep it quiet. degree is in engineering though.

    Comment by Bhanu Singh — November 14, 2005 @ 5:46 pm

  67. At least ur not one of those idiots with an ethnic studies phd

    Comment by anonymous — November 14, 2005 @ 6:41 pm

  68. anonymity, if you really need a reason for my “attack”, you can start with the fact that your analogy makes no sense whatsoever. (and I’m not a bush fan, just someone who’s annoyed by people who feel the need to share their poorly-thought-out attempts at political commentary)

    Comment by bob — November 14, 2005 @ 7:31 pm

  69. haha. sure youd rather keep it quiet. are you a CEO too?

    Comment by mano — November 14, 2005 @ 8:29 pm

  70. mano, nope, not a CEO.

    Comment by Bhanu Singh — November 14, 2005 @ 11:04 pm

  71. you sure? seems like everyone’s coming down with a case of the CEOs. well, chet, anyway.

    Comment by mano — November 14, 2005 @ 11:41 pm

  72. lol how did manoob jackT dis thread?

    fukin Anoob is a shiTTy quarterback. time to benchT that kid. either way this season is alrdy a bust… i just hope we dont lose to those fukin clowns from stanford.

    -smashT
    “please smashT stanford and save this season”

    Comment by smashT — November 14, 2005 @ 11:41 pm

  73. Greetings,

    Stumbled on this link last night. It’s stupid, but nonetheless entertaining.

    http://www.stanford.edu/~whaas/

    What is Kappa Sig..some kind of degenerate Animal House?

    Comment by Atilla the Hun — November 15, 2005 @ 10:05 am

  74. Can we talk about the sherman boyson ni**er incident yet???

    Comment by anon54 — November 15, 2005 @ 3:05 pm

  75. yeah what’s wrong calstuff… too politically incorrect for your tastes?

    This deals with issues of racism (ni**er), imagism (fat f**k) and sexism (b*tch)

    Comment by Anonymous — November 15, 2005 @ 3:10 pm

  76. whatever. calstuff is dropping the ball on all sorts of stuff. not even a sideways comment about the upcoming regents meeting and protest.

    Comment by mano — November 15, 2005 @ 3:52 pm

  77. Yeah, USC is like what, 3 days old?

    Comment by Anonymous — November 15, 2005 @ 4:18 pm

  78. at least :) .

    but calstuff (with the exception of andy) really hasnt had much but reposted news articles. cooper and allen def. arent pulling their weight.

    Comment by mano — November 15, 2005 @ 5:03 pm

  79. Are we allowed to hijack threads? I want to talk Boyson, but there’s no post. He’s my advisor, and I am shocked that he used the n word. Sure, the girl should not have said “fat fuck” but you’d think an adult in his 50s would have the self-control or maturity not to stoop so low. Sigh…I have to see him this week, but I won’t mention the incident.

    Comment by Anonymous — November 15, 2005 @ 5:38 pm

  80. Anyone get a load of those fat fucks on the USC O-Line?

    Comment by McMike — November 15, 2005 @ 7:10 pm

  81. I’m damn proud the guy stood up for himself. I would have done the same, and no amount of crying will stop me from defending my honor. What’s the worst she would have done, called her friends to “bring the heat?”

    Comment by anonymous — November 15, 2005 @ 7:13 pm

  82. if you want to talk about boyson, talk about boyson. Then if other people also want to weigh in, they will. it’s really that simple. maybe nobody gives a damn about sherman boyson or the girl he insulted. Sherman boyson is a nobody and this story is a nothing story.

    Comment by bob — November 15, 2005 @ 7:33 pm

  83. The free box is back in the park.

    Comment by quotidian — November 15, 2005 @ 7:36 pm

  84. suge pula

    Comment by Anonymous — November 15, 2005 @ 7:57 pm

  85. hijack away. dont mind if i do: the regents are raising student fees AGAIN and they will get rid of critical services for disabled students. all out thursday to fuck their shit up!

    http://fucktheregents.com/

    Comment by mano — November 15, 2005 @ 8:03 pm

  86. proud the guy stood up for himself? whatever. i beat up a 13 year old the other day for looking at me funny. you proud of me?

    Comment by mano — November 15, 2005 @ 8:05 pm

  87. sticks and stones, mano.

    Comment by anonymous — November 15, 2005 @ 8:34 pm

  88. I have a post defending what they guy said. Someone please call me a racist.

    Comment by patr — November 16, 2005 @ 12:02 am

  89. well, patr, you certainly are a freaking idiot. you must have tired your poor little brain out with that post though, so get your rest.

    Comment by mano — November 16, 2005 @ 1:17 am

  90. anonymous #84: suge pula? you talking to me?

    Futut-te-n cur sa~. Fata de muist

    Comment by bob — November 16, 2005 @ 11:22 am

  91. In pizda matii de poponar ce esti. In pula mea, ce pizda matii vrei? Cine pula me esti ba, handi?

    Comment by Anonymous — November 18, 2005 @ 12:13 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. RSS feed

Say Something

Sorry, comments are closed at this time. If you wish to continue the discussion, email the post author.