<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RSS/ATOM Feeds springing up in the blogs</title>
	<link>http://calstuff.blogsome.com/2005/06/27/rssatom-feeds-springing-up-in-the-blogs/</link>
	<description>News and Observations about the University of California, Berkeley.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 08:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Andy R.</title>
		<link>http://calstuff.blogsome.com/2005/06/27/rssatom-feeds-springing-up-in-the-blogs/#comment-147</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 15:21:14 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://calstuff.blogsome.com/2005/06/27/rssatom-feeds-springing-up-in-the-blogs/#comment-147</guid>
					<description>The reason that it was blocking your comments gomez, is that the default for blogsome comments is any comment with three or more url links in it is characterized as spam and a moderator has to approve it.  Your comment wasn't lost, it was just waiting for one of us to approve it.  That being said, I think our risk of spam comments is low, and we are probably going to raise the allowable number of links to a higher number.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The reason that it was blocking your comments gomez, is that the default for blogsome comments is any comment with three or more url links in it is characterized as spam and a moderator has to approve it.  Your comment wasn&#8217;t lost, it was just waiting for one of us to approve it.  That being said, I think our risk of spam comments is low, and we are probably going to raise the allowable number of links to a higher number.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Allen L.</title>
		<link>http://calstuff.blogsome.com/2005/06/27/rssatom-feeds-springing-up-in-the-blogs/#comment-145</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 14:14:08 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://calstuff.blogsome.com/2005/06/27/rssatom-feeds-springing-up-in-the-blogs/#comment-145</guid>
					<description>I'm not sure why it did that, but I just approved the last comment.  I'll look into it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;m not sure why it did that, but I just approved the last comment.  I&#8217;ll look into it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: gomez</title>
		<link>http://calstuff.blogsome.com/2005/06/27/rssatom-feeds-springing-up-in-the-blogs/#comment-144</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 14:13:00 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://calstuff.blogsome.com/2005/06/27/rssatom-feeds-springing-up-in-the-blogs/#comment-144</guid>
					<description>dammit, the comment engine doesn't seem to like raw URLs.  :o(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>dammit, the comment engine doesn&#8217;t seem to like raw URLs.  <img src='http://calstuff.blogsome.com/wp-images/smilies/icon_surprised.gif' alt=':o' class='wp-smiley' /> (
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: gomez</title>
		<link>http://calstuff.blogsome.com/2005/06/27/rssatom-feeds-springing-up-in-the-blogs/#comment-142</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 14:11:30 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://calstuff.blogsome.com/2005/06/27/rssatom-feeds-springing-up-in-the-blogs/#comment-142</guid>
					<description>huh?!?  why are my comments blocked?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>huh?!?  why are my comments blocked?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: gomez</title>
		<link>http://calstuff.blogsome.com/2005/06/27/rssatom-feeds-springing-up-in-the-blogs/#comment-140</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 14:01:53 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://calstuff.blogsome.com/2005/06/27/rssatom-feeds-springing-up-in-the-blogs/#comment-140</guid>
					<description>For those lazy LiveJournal people:

The power of syndicated feeds!
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.livejournal.com/users/beetlebeat/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Beetlebeat&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.livejournal.com/users/calpatriotwatch/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Cal Patriot Watch&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.livejournal.com/users/caljunket/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Cal Junket&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>For those lazy LiveJournal people:</p>
	<p>The power of syndicated feeds!<br />
<a href="http://www.livejournal.com/users/beetlebeat/" rel="nofollow">Beetlebeat</a><br />
<a href="http://www.livejournal.com/users/calpatriotwatch/" rel="nofollow">Cal Patriot Watch</a><br />
<a href="http://www.livejournal.com/users/caljunket/" rel="nofollow">Cal Junket</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Allen L.</title>
		<link>http://calstuff.blogsome.com/2005/06/27/rssatom-feeds-springing-up-in-the-blogs/#comment-139</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 13:23:52 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://calstuff.blogsome.com/2005/06/27/rssatom-feeds-springing-up-in-the-blogs/#comment-139</guid>
					<description>silly blgosome, by default all my posts are assigned to you for some reason</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>silly blgosome, by default all my posts are assigned to you for some reason
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ben N.</title>
		<link>http://calstuff.blogsome.com/2005/06/27/rssatom-feeds-springing-up-in-the-blogs/#comment-138</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 12:55:14 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://calstuff.blogsome.com/2005/06/27/rssatom-feeds-springing-up-in-the-blogs/#comment-138</guid>
					<description>uh... I didnt write this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>uh&#8230; I didnt write this.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
